Book Reviews Subscribe Faith-filled Family Links for Learners Ask a Franciscan Editorial Entertainment Watch Saints for Our Lives Contents

Keeping Colleges Catholic

  First Attempt Failed

  Unique American Situation

Mandate Remains a Problem



Smart-alecks used to joke that “Catholic university” was an oxymoron—a contradiction in terms, like jumbo shrimp and postal service. How can an educational institution that offers “the universe” of knowledge—the full panoply of academic disciplines and approaches—also be “Catholic”—beholden to Roman Catholicism, the pope and magisterium?

This month at their meeting in Washington, D.C., the U.S. bishops will again grapple with this question. It’s bound to be a telling debate. Nine years ago Pope John Paul II issued an apostolic constitution on Catholic universities, Ex Corde Ecclesiae (From the Heart of the Church). That document was the result of 20 years of consultation worldwide with university presidents, professors and associations, and an attempt to apply the 1983 Code of Canon Law to Catholic higher education.

Ex Corde Ecclesiae was initially praised for its vigorous defense of academic freedom and the pursuit of truth. It said Catholic schools are to provide a Catholic presence in the world, to engage the local culture and to foster the dialogue between science and religion.

But Ex Corde Ecclesiae also intended to clarify the relationship between the Church and institutions of higher education. It requires bishops’ conferences to establish norms for implementing this document in their countries.

First Attempt Failed

The attempt in 1995 by the U.S. bishops “to place Ex Corde Ecclesiae within the context of our nation” was rejected by the Holy See in 1997 as too vague. The committee, headed by Bishop John J. Leibrecht of Springfield-Cape Girardeau, Missouri, had deliberately chosen a non-juridical application intended to preserve the values inherent in Ex Corde Ecclesiae without making new law.

The primary sticking point is the application of Canon #812, which states that “it is necessary that those who teach theological disciplines in any institute of higher studies have a mandate from the competent ecclesiastical authority.”

A subcommittee of canonists, led by Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia, addressed the Holy See’s concerns. Now the full bishops’ conference has a new text to debate.

Unique American Situation

Currently, 238 American colleges and universities call themselves Catholic. With 698,855 students, this is the largest such system in the world, and was achieved in the face of Church/state separation. Most colleges were started by religious orders of men and women but may now have autonomous boards.

The institutions range from small liberal-arts colleges set in idyllic rural settings to large urban commuter schools. Each has its own identity and mission.

The pressures on Catholic colleges today are intense and varied—financial, legal and cultural. To give an example, the 129-year-old Loyola University Chicago, under severe financial pressure since detaching its medical center, is struggling to cut $20 million from its budget and had to raise tuition to $18,310 a year this fall, reported The Chicago Tribune (September 19, 1999).

Any norms that would put Catholic colleges at risk for losing government funds or inviting lawsuits on grounds of religious discrimination would only add to the stresses these schools already face.

Catholic schools are not wishy-washy in their religious identity. They do not want to have to detach theology departments into separate divinity schools as Protestant-founded institutions like Harvard and Vanderbilt did, for the sake of academic credibility and denominational arm’s length.

Mandate Remains a Problem

The new text to be voted on by the bishops now specifies that the purpose of a Catholic university is not “religious indoctrination or proselytization,” which could have jeopardized public aid; recommends the majority of the trustees and faculty should be Catholics “committed to the Church,” rather than using the ambiguous term “faithful Catholics,” and adds a qualifier, “as much as possible”; clarifies that administrators are left free to hire and fire faculty and that bishops do not enter into the college’s hiring decisions, even for theology faculty.

These changes improve the document, but the problem of the mandate (approval by a bishop) required for Catholic theology teachers remains.

According to Dr. Terrence Tilley, chairman of the religious studies department at the University of Dayton, refined guidelines about the mandate are still problematic enough to send the wrong message, namely, that one’s academic freedom is restricted. That could discourage top-caliber Catholic students from studying at Roman Catholic institutions.

Marianist Brother Raymond L. Fitz, president of the same university and a consultant for the bishops’ committee on Ex Corde Ecclesiae, concurs. While “bishops have the right to be vigilant over Catholic universities and comment on that,” he says, “I just don’t think the mandate is the right way to do that.”

In fact, no regional or national norms from anywhere in the world have yet been approved by the Holy See. The United States need not be the first.

Because these guidelines could irredeemably alter the character and mission of U.S. Catholic higher education, why not take a little longer to achieve real consensus?—B.B.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ask The Wise Man  | The Bible: Light to My Path  | Book Reviews  | Entertainment Watch
Editorial  | Editor’s Message  | Faith-filled Family  | Links for Learners
Saints for Our Lives  | Web Catholic  | Back Issues

Return to

Paid Advertisement
Ads contrary to Catholic teachings should be reported to our webmaster. Include ad link.

An Web Site from the Franciscans and
Franciscan Media     ©1996-2016 Copyright