D.C. Votes for Same-sex Marriage; Archdiocese Continues Dialogue
By Laura Wright
Source: Catholic News Service
Published: Thursday, December 03, 2009
WASHINGTON (CNS)—The Washington Archdiocese vowed continued dialogue with the District of Columbia's City Council to seek "a balance of interests in the legislation" after the council Dec. 1 gave preliminary approval to a bill to legalize same-sex marriage.
In an 11-2 vote the council passed the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009. A required second vote was to take place in the weeks ahead, then the bill was to be sent on to Washington Mayor Adrian Fenty, who has said he will sign it.
District laws also are subject to congressional review under the Home Rule Charter.
"As the legislation moves forward, the Archdiocese of Washington will continue its dialogue with the council," Susan Gibbs, spokeswoman for the archdiocese, said in a Dec. 1 statement.
As written, the current legislation would require faith-based social service providers to compromise their religious teachings and beliefs on gay marriage in order to be eligible to partner with the district government in providing social services to Washington residents.
The Washington Archdiocese is morally opposed to the bill because it redefines marriage. The church's opposition is based on the Catholic Church's teaching that marriage is a permanent union between one man and one woman.
Archdiocesan officials have expressed concern that the bill as written would severely limit the ability of its agency Catholic Charities to work with the city in serving the poor. But they also have emphasized that contrary to media reports, the agency will continue to serve the city's poor regardless of the outcome of the same-sex marriage bill.
"We have a long history of service and are committed to continuing to serve. We hope we can work out a bill that balances interests. The needs in D.C. are so great; we need to work together to maximize support for the vulnerable," Gibbs said.
The archdiocese, Catholic Charities and "our other agencies are committed to continuing to serve the people of the District of Columbia as we have done for more than 80 years, with the resources available to us," said Gibbs.
Catholic Charities serves 68,000 people in the District of Columbia regardless of their faith, and recently won the 2009 National Capital Business Ethics Award for demonstrating a firm commitment to ethical business practices, management philosophies and response to crises or challenges.
Council member Tommy Wells said Catholic Charities is just one of several charitable organizations that contract with the city to serve the needy.
Gibbs said Catholic Charities is not as replaceable and dispensable as Wells has suggested.
Archdiocesan officials also have repeatedly expressed concerns about the bill's religious freedom exemption, which they consider to be flawed.
During hearings in October, Catholic officials testified that the bill would restrict the free exercise of religious beliefs and leave the archdiocese and other religious institutions vulnerable to lawsuits.
But council members failed to work toward a compromise on the religious freedom exemption even after the archdiocese and several other witnesses pointed to its flaws in testimony before the council.
If the bill becomes law, the district will join New Hampshire, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont and Massachusetts in legalizing same-sex marriage.
In New York, the executive director of the state Catholic conference said Dec. 2 that the state's bishops were "extremely pleased and grateful" about the Senate's 38-24 defeat of a bill that would have rewritten the definition of marriage and its rejection of "the concept that marriage can be anything other than the union of one man and one woman."
"While the Catholic Church rejects unjust discrimination against homosexual men and women, there is no question that marriage by its nature is the union of one man and one woman," said Richard E. Barnes. "Advocates for same-sex 'marriage' have attempted to portray their cause as inevitable. However, it has become clear that Americans continue to understand marriage the way it has always been understood, and New York is not different in that regard."
In a statement before the Senate vote, Barnes noted that in recent years, "voters in 31 states have taken up the issue of changing the timeless definition of marriage and 31 times they have voted to preserve marriage as the union of one man and one woman."
Barnes said "opinion polls routinely overstate public support for this radical social experiment." He cited Maine as an example where "advocates for reinventing marriage outspent their opponents" but could not sway voters. They rejected same-sex marriage Nov. 3, overturning a marriage equality law passed in May.
In New Jersey, where the Legislature also is considering a bill to redefine marriage, the state's bishops signed a joint statement urging the state's Catholics to observe Nov. 29 as a day of prayer for the sanctity of marriage.
In the statement, the bishops reiterated that marriage is a union of one man and one woman and said they would "not stand silent" about proposed legislation to change the definition.
More on Marriage >>
More Top Catholic News >>
blog comments powered by