Contents Year of St. Paul Eye On Entertainment Editorial Ask a Franciscan Links for Learners Faith-filled Family Book Reviews Subscribe

The Bible As God's Self-revelation
By Father Pat McCloskey, O.F.M.

Q U I C K S C A N

What Authority Does the Bible Have?
How Does a Parish Receive Its Name?
Which Version of the Our Father Should We Use?
Does This Person Need to Be Confirmed Again?


Q: My adult nephew recently asked me: “How do I know that the Bible is the Word of God and not simply a collection of human writings? How do I know that the people who decided what belongs in the Bible didn’t simply include what they wanted?” I need a better answer than I have at present.

A: God’s self-revelation comes to us through human beings chosen by God. The Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, assures us that the biblical books are divinely inspired. God helped believers to recognize that inspiration and so collect these writings into a unique library of books. This process worked essentially the same way for the Old Testament and the New Testament.

For example, Jeremiah was not the only prophet active in Judea in the early sixth century B.C. Many other prophets tailored their message to what the people wanted to hear. Their writings are not part of the Bible, not because there was a conspiracy to keep them out but rather because they simply do not reflect God the way that the Book of Jeremiah does.

There exist Gospels of Thomas, Mary, Mary Magdalene and other names associated with Jesus. Why aren’t they in the New Testament? The Christian community did not recognize its faith in these writings—no matter whose prestigious name was attached to them. Jesus as a child did not make clay pigeons and zap them into life, as the Infancy Gospel of Thomas says he did.

God’s self-revelation comes in human history, not in some other time sequence. People can and need to grow in faith, as members of a community and as individuals. The Bible belongs to the whole faith community before it belongs to any individual member.

Conspiracy theories can be great fun. “They” wanted us to have only this information and thus they withheld certain facts. Witness the commercial success of Dan Brown’s books The Da Vinci Code and Angels & Demons. They may make for engaging fiction reading, but are no more than that.

Until you start assessing evidence, every conspiracy theory is as valid as any other. Why engage in them at all? Conspiracy theories can empower people who otherwise feel relegated to spectator status, deprived of the power that they feel they deserve.

You could ask your nephew, “Why do some parts of Scripture challenge other parts? Why does the Bible contain stories that show biblical heroes such as David and St. Peter in an unfavorable light?”

The Bible needs to be read as a whole. There is great variety within the Bible, a variety that conspiracy theorists tend to ignore.

The Old Testament’s Book of Job is a cautionary tale. It rebukes Job’s friends who offer a self-serving theology and, in effect, say, “All suffering is a punishment for sin. After you admit your sin, God will forgive you and then restore what you have lost because we all know that wealth is a sign of God’s favor and poverty is a sign of God’s displeasure with that individual.”

God, however, says to Eliphaz, one of Job’s friends, “I am angry with you and with your two friends; for you have not spoken rightly concerning me, as has my servant Job” (42:7b). They carry out God’s command to offer sacrifice and Job prays for them (see 42:9).

Likewise, the Book of Jonah warns against remaking God in our image, assuming that God needs to take directions from us about whom to love and whom to hate. Jonah is the Bible’s only prophet to complain that his preaching was too successful! Although deep down he hoped that the Ninevites would not repent, they did—and that made Jonah angry (see 4:1-11).

The New Testament’s Letter of James is concerned that wealthy Christians might look down on poor ones (see 2:1-13) or that some Christians could think that proclaiming their faith could substitute for living it (see 2:14-26).

Some people attempt to whittle God down to a convenient size by saying that God is simply a human projection. Likewise, the Bible can be dismissed by claiming that it is a “merely human” document that resulted from a small number of people seeking to foist on others their distorted thinking about God.

In the Bible, God chose to reveal himself through both joyful and sad events: the Exodus, the exile in Babylon, the birth of Jesus, his death and resurrection, as well as the persecution of his followers.

There are genuine conspiracies—for example, the plot to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. The Bible, however, is not a human conspiracy. Rather, it is the result of God’s self-revelation over many centuries, made to a community of believers but intended for all God’s people.

The whole Bible is inspired by God—not simply the parts we may quote to other people to justify our actions. Ultimately, God is the Bible’s author. As the world’s bishops wrote last October, “Divine inspiration did not erase the historical identities and personalities of [the Bible’s] human authors” (Message to the People of God of the XII Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, #5).

The Bible must be studied by Jews and Christians for what it reveals about God. If, as your nephew suggests, it is simply the result of a human conspiracy, then studying it becomes a hobby, something optional (“If that sort of thing appeals to you”). God, our faith tells us, wants to share divine life with us—in part through Scripture.

Q: I was asked this question by a family member and do not know the answer. Who chooses: the bishop, the first pastor, the parishioners? I’ve never wondered about this until recently.

A: The bishop makes the final decision about the name. According to Canon 515:2 of the Code of Canon Law, a bishop must consult his council of priests before establishing, suppressing or altering parishes.

Especially in the case of merged parishes, a bishop may prefer not simply using the names of two previous parishes but may select an entirely new name after consulting those directly involved. For example, I am aware of two places where three parishes were merged into a new parish, each named Holy Trinity.

Sometimes a diocese may have a series going (naming a parish after each of the apostles, or one of the mysteries of the Rosary) or may wish to recognize a new saint with particular significance for that country. For example, there were no parishes named for Elizabeth Ann Seton or John Neumann until after they were canonized in 1975 and 1977, respectively. Now there are many.

Q: In my parish, after we say, “but deliver us from evil,” the celebrant recites a short prayer to which we answer, “For the kingdom, the power and the glory are yours, now and for ever.” In a parish seven miles away, with gusto they say this immediately after the petition “but deliver us from evil.”

A: Your parish is following the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM). The prayer that the celebrant says immediately after the Our Father is called the embolism and reads: “Deliver us, Lord, from every evil, and grant us peace in our day. In your mercy keep us free from sin and protect us from all anxiety as we wait in joyful hope for the coming of our Savior, Jesus Christ.”

According to Section 81 of GIRM, the proper sequence is Our Father, embolism and then doxology (“For the kingdom, the power and the glory are yours, now and for ever”).

Some biblical manuscripts conclude the Our Father with this doxology, but the more reliable manuscripts do not. The Catholic Church has chosen to add a prayer between the original ending and the later ending.

Q: If someone receives the Sacrament of Confirmation but is not in the state of grace at the time, does he or she need to be reconfirmed? I have heard that Confirmation is one of the sacraments that cannot be repeated. Is this true?

A: Confirmation, like Baptism and Holy Orders, involves a unique “character” and cannot be repeated. It is better to receive any sacrament in the state of grace. An unbaptized person not in the state of grace needs to receive Baptism, and baptized persons need the Sacrament of Reconciliation to return to the state of grace.

A sacrament is validly administered if the person intends to receive the sacrament, the minister intends to confer it and the sacrament is celebrated according to the intention of the Church and its authorized form.

If you have a question for Father Pat, please submit it here. Include your street address for personal replies enclosing a stamped, self-addressed envelope, please. Some answer material must be mailed since it is not available in digital form. You can still send questions to: Ask a Franciscan, 28 W. Liberty Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ask a Franciscan  |  Book Reviews  |  Eye on Entertainment  |  Editorial
Editor’s Message  |  Faith-filled Family  |  Links for Learners
 Year of St. Paul  |  Bible’s Supporting Cast  |  Modern Models of Holiness
 Rediscovering Catholic Traditions  |  Psalms: Heartfelt Prayers  |  Saints for Our Lives
 Beloved Prayers  |  Bible: Light to My Path  |  Web Catholic  |  Back Issues


Return to AmericanCatholic.org

Paid Advertisement
Ads contrary to Catholic teachings should be reported to our webmaster. Include ad link.

An AmericanCatholic.org Web Site from the Franciscans and
Franciscan Media     ©1996-2014 Copyright



 Find 
 FIND