By Sr. Rose Pacatte, F.S.P.
When I learned that Rachel McAdams
was going to play the lead role in what looked to be another tearjerker film
about marriage I wondered if the story would be based on a Nicholas Sparks
novel such as “The Notebook.” No, this new film is based on a very true story
that was told in the 2000 book The Vow: The Kim and Krickitt Carpenter Story by Kim Carpenter.
1993, ten weeks after this Mormon couple married, they were injured in a
terrible car accident. Krickitt, who was driving, was in a coma and when she
woke up had no memory of the previous 18 months or so since she had met and
married Kim. When Krickitt recovered enough she decided that if she had liked
Kim enough before to marry him, she would date him again to see if the spark
could be rekindled. It was, and in 1996 they remarried (renewed their vows) and
have since had two children. Krickitt has never recovered her memory of those
18 months though her long-term memory, that is pre-Kim, is in tact.
Vow” the basic story is the same though the details have been changed and more
dramatic tension added. And while Kim and Krickitt are a handsome couple, the
megawatt looks and chemistry of Rachel McAdams (Paige) and Channing Tatum (Leo)
leave just about everyone else in the dust.
and Leo meet by chance at the bank on one fine day in Chicago where they live.
Then they meet again at the coffee shop where Paige works, “The Mnemonic”. Their friendship grows until Leo invites
Paige, an artist, to move in with him and his band. Not long after, in a ceremony reminiscent of
the hippy era, they exchange vows at the art museum before being chased out.
Over the next three years the couple gets their own place, Paige gets a huge
commission for statues, and Leo starts his own recording studio.
late on a winter’s night, on the way home on a deserted street, Paige unhooks
her safety belt to make out her husband. A snowplow rams their car from the
rear and Paige is thrown through the windshield. When she wakes from a coma, she remembers
nothing of the four years she has known Leo. Her parents (Jessica Lange and Sam
Neill) appear to take her home but Leo protests since in all the time he has
known Paige, they have never even tried to contact her. Leo takes Paige home
and they try to make it work, but Paige returns to her parents’ house to try to
discover why she left home. She hoped it would trigger a memory that would
heart of this story is in Leo’s voice-over narration as he describes his
commitment the vow that he made to Paige, and what her vow to him meant. The
moral conundrum runs deep here. In a valid Catholic Christian marriage, what
are the options for a couple should something like this happen to them? I asked
a priest in good standing who served many years on a diocesan marriage tribunal
this question and here is what he wrote: “Suffice it to say, for this film, that from a Catholic
perspective the woman’s decision to value the ‘forgotten’ but ‘real’ commitment
she made and to not just ‘throw that out’ but to value it enough to give a
chance to discover it anew is highly admirable and fully in accord with our
teachings on the sacredness of marriage.”
The most interesting visual motif in the film is the name of
the café that appears throughout the film: “The Mnemonic”. A mnemonic is a mental method to trigger a
memory. For example, I was able to recall the letters on a car’s license plate,
USC, by linking it to “University Santa Clara”. If you saw the 2009 film
“Slumdog Millionaire” you will recall that the main character Jamal (Dev Patel)
wins “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?” because he connects his answers to people
the story moving, especially when the Carpenter family is shown before the
final credits run. But the audience at
the screening I attended, mostly young women, fell into a group swoon the first
time Channing Tatum takes off his shirt.
It’s possible one of the girls may have fainted; I don’t know. He does
reveal his derrière, albeit briefly, as well.
film could have gone deeper into the emotional and moral dilemmas but chose to
skim these by creating a more dramatic backstory for Paige and her family and
maintaining the eye-candy appeal of the lead actors.
devotion to his marriage vows is reinforced throughout, as well as his respect
for Paige, and Paige’s faith and courage, regardless of any other seeming flaws
in the film, creates the overarching meaning of “The Vow”.
If you were Leo (Kim) or Paige (Krickitt), what
would you have done? Lots to talk about here.
Thank you for your comments. Editors will review all posts before they are visible on the website.
blog comments powered by