|
by Friar Jim Van Vurst, O.F.M.
This reflection is on annulment, which some people unfortunately refer
to as “Catholic divorce.” This is not accurate. A civil divorce breaks a marriage
bond. However, an annulment, which is granted by the Church, declares that a marriage was
invalid from the beginning for reasons that came to light only during the course of an
annulment investigation. Keep in mind that marriage is a sacrament, covenant and a contract.
Any contract needs to meet certain conditions to be valid, and a contract
is not valid when just one condition is missing. Here are some reasons why a marriage contract
might be invalid:
a) A person marries only under severe pressure from family. He really
doesn’t want to but does it to make others happy. The marriage contract must be freely
entered.
b) A person is immature and does not have a sufficient understanding
of the seriousness of the marriage contract.
c) A person enters marriage with plans to leave if certain problems arise.
One entering a marriage must intend to be committed for life.
e) A person enters a marriage without guaranteeing his or her fidelity.
Fidelity is an absolute condition for marriage contracts.
f) Mental illness present at the time a couple is married goes undetected
and comes to light only later in the marriage. However, one can detect symptoms in the
past when looking back.
g) One spouse is an angry, violent person and becomes abusive after the
couple is married. This calls into question the suitability of the spouse at the time of
marriage.
These are some issues that most reasonable people would deem worthy to
vitiate a marriage contract. You may wonder why these conditions are not discovered before
weddings. Often they are, which is the reason why the Church wants couples to spend time
preparing for this all-important commitment. Six months may seem like a long time to prepare,
but it is not when you remember that marriage is for life.
The annulment process determines if any condition (like the ones mentioned
above) was present at the time of the wedding that might render a marriage invalid. This
determination may be made after a marriage of just a few years or many years has ended.
A person seeking an annulment fills out a long questionnaire in which
he or she describes the marriage, its preparation and the grounds for the annulment. Witnesses
who can support the petitioner are questioned. Also, an attempt is always made to contact
the other spouse (and the spouses own witnesses) so that he or she can agree, object
or provide a personal opinion.
If the other spouse refuses to become involved after several attempts
to make contact, this does not automatically stop the investigation. If the annulment case
is found to have merit, it is processed through the courts of the marriage tribunal. After
a judgment either for or against the annulment is made, the person seeking the annulment
and the spouse are informed of the decision.
If the annulment is granted, the petitioner and the former spouse are
free to marry again. However, in light of the causes behind the prior marriages failure,
some kind of counseling may be required of the parties involved before remarriage is permitted.
Some cases are long and involved and may take several years. In cases where the evidence
is very strong, the annulment process is surprisingly short. Most annulment cases fall
somewhere in the middle.
Because it will often bring up deep hurt and anger from the past, seeking
an annulment can be a very painful experience. Whoever is helping the person with the questionnaire
and the annulment process must be very compassionate and understanding. Even though we
speak of contracts, we should not lessen the pastoral care given during this time.
Finally, it is important to note that the granting of an annulment in
no way changes the legitimacy of the children born of that annulled union. Because it was
a legal union recognized by the state, even though the Church did not recognize it, all
offspring are always considered legitimate. Legitimacy is significant because of issues
such as child support and inheritance.
For further reading on annulment:
Ten
Questions About Annulment
Bringing
Your Marriage Into the Church
Readers
respond to Friar Jacks musings on
The Buried
Treasure Is Always Available.
Dear Friar Jack: Thank you so much for the article on the Kingdom
of God/heaven. It is helping to clear up much confusion Ive wrestled with over the
meanings of the phrases. I feel this is one of your best articles. God bless you and thanks
be to God for pouring his Spirit out upon you so mightily! In his service, Gary
Dear Friar Jack: I am a Sister of Charity of Halifax. We were
trained in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where our motherhouse is. Now, young women are trained
locally. I turned 92 years old yesterday and have had great religious training all my life.
I appreciate all the messages you write on the computer. I especially am inspired by this
latest message of yours, The
Buried Treasure Is Always Available. Thanks so very much, Friar Jack. God bless
you! I was in need of that message just at the time I read it.
Sister Ann
Dear Friar Jack: I enjoyed and learned much from your treatise
on the Kingdom of God. I am stymied, though as I try to apply the substitution that you
suggested in your E-spiration. It is Matthew 13:47-53, which starts: The Kingdom
of heaven is like a net thrown in to sea
. Your suggested substitution would
change it to: Gods saving presence is like a net thrown into sea, which collects
fish of every kind. When it is full they haul it ashore and sit down to put what is good
into buckets. What is bad they throw away
angels will go out and separate the wicked
from the righteous and throw them into the fiery furnace
To me, this puts a
negative spin on Gods saving presence. It seems as if the Kingdom of heaven is weeding
out the good from the bad. Could you comment on this passage? I would appreciate it. Celia
Dear Celia: Thanks for your comments and question. I had a feeling
that some of you might experience difficulties in applying my suggestion of substituting
the words Gods saving presence whenever they encountered the phrase Kingdom
of God (or Kingdom of heaven) in the Gospels. Its a little tricky at times
because of the poetic nature of Jesus parables, but I think my suggestion can usually
be made to work. Heres the way I would look at the Kingdom of heaven in terms of
the net thrown into the sea, which collects fish of every kind. The net, as
a whole, represents Gods Kingdom, that is, Gods saving presence and Gods
wish that all human beings be gathered into Gods saving presence and come to healing
and salvation. However, as human beings we are free to accept or resist Gods healing.
Gods Kingdom or saving presence is always at handalways among usready
to save us. But God respects our gift of freedom and doesnt force us to accept his
invitation to the Kingdom. The bad fish are those who reject the Kingdom, which nevertheless
remains graciously among them awaiting their conversion.
A similar parable is that of the weeds among the wheat. This appears
a little earlier in the same chapter of Matthews Gospel. Jesus says, The Kingdom
of heaven is like a man who sows good seeds in his field, but his enemy comes and
sows weeds throughout the wheat. Again the good seeds represent those who collaborate with
Gods saving presence in their midst, while the weeds represent those who do not wish
to be part of Gods saving plan. In some cases it takes a little juggling for my suggested substitution
device to work. It may not always work perfectly, but it has helped me in my own
understanding of a very central theme in Jesus teaching, namely, the Kingdom of heaven.
Let me add a word of thanks to the many good readers who responded to
my last E-spiration (July 28) with many interesting e-mails. May the Risen Jesus
bless you and gather you all into his loving and healing presence! Friar Jack
For further reading:
What
Is the Kingdom of God?
Send your feedback to friarjack@franciscanmedia.org.
|