|
Over the years
I have heard both helpful and not-so-helpful ways of thinking and
speaking about evil.
On the helpful side: in 1974 I interviewed the late Father Henri
Nouwen about the writings of Thomas Merton on nonviolence. Nouwen
was a teacher at Yale Divinity School at the time and had recently
written a book about Merton entitled Pray to Live.
Father Nouwen
said that Merton saw a close connection between violence and a faulty
notion of evil. If you see evil as something out there,
something outside yourself, sharply defined and irreversible,"
explained Nouwen, "then the only way to deal with it is in
the same way you would deal with a malignant tumor: You cut it out,
take it out, eradicate it, burn it away, kill itwhich means
you immediately become violent.
Nouwen pointed out how Adolf Hitler had identified the Jews as the
evil thing and believed that once you take that away,
there will be no more evil.
Thomas Merton, who had studied Mahatma Gandhis ideas on nonviolence,
believed that the above way of thinking was an oversimplification.
Thanks to Gandhi, said Nouwen, Merton started to discover
that the roots of all problems were in his own soul, too, that evil
is not something outside himself that could be identified, but part
of the whole human condition of which he was a part.
Nouwen emphasized Mertons view that the roots of evil are
in the human heart, and the first place to start converting or reversing
the evil process is in ones own heart. The whole conversion
experience, says Nouwen, begins with the recognition
and confession that you are part of the problem. You are part of
the evil in the world, and you can not simply point your finger
at the evil world.
To follow the wisdom of Thomas Merton, we should not merely seek
to exterminate the evil outside of ourselves, but first of all to
diminish the evil tendencies within us: selfishness, pride, vengeance,
hatred, violence. These impulses we hold in common with all humanity.
As Merton wrote in his New Seeds of Contemplation, Instead
of hating the people you think are the warmakers, hate the appetites
and the disorder in your own soul, which are the causes of war.
If you love peace, then hate injustice, hate tyranny, hate greed,
but hate these things in yourself, not in another.
Jesus had already taught a similar way of dealing with evil when
he said, Why do you notice the splinter in your brothers
eye, but do not perceive the wooden beam in your own? How can you
say to your brother, Brother, let me remove that splinter
in your eye, when you do not even notice the wooden beam in
your own eye? (Luke 6:41-42). In the same chapter of Luke,
Jesus also teaches about loving your enemies and forgiving rather
than condemning others.
Now let's consider some not-so-helpful ways of speaking about evil.
A number of people around the country and around the world, including
myself, have a problem with some of the language about evil used
by President George W. Bush and some of our military leaders. Their
approach seems quite different from that of Jesus, Thomas Merton
and Henri Nouwen. I think it is helpful for all of us to think about
those differences.
Perhaps, it may seem POLITICALLY correct to speak about wiping
out Osama bin Laden and similar evil-doers or
to refer to the nations of Iran, Iraq and North Korea as an Axis
of Evil. But is it good theology? Is it a good expression
of the spirit of the gospel? Is it really bringing people of different
cultures and religious backgrounds closer to peace and understanding
and global unity? I doubt it.
Yes, societies have a right and a duty to protect their citizens
from terrorismand to confront and bring to justice those who
commit acts of mass murder. But is it fair to perceive a country
like Iran or Iraq as absolute evil and to pretend that we are free
and innocent of all evil? Is our record really that cleanwe
with our history of racism, abortion, child abuse, and of corporate
bosses sucking the life-savings from those lower down the economic
ladder?
Yes, Osama bin Laden and those guilty of the terrorist attacks of
September 11 are guilty of horrendous crimes. They have more than
little specks or splinters in their eyes. Indeed, they exemplify
Jesus analogy that those who see evil in the eyes and actions
of others usually dont see the big blotch of evil in their
own eyes and actions.
And yet, Jesus does not instruct us, his followers, to view even
terrible sinners as absolute evil, as if their evil actions are
irreversible. He believes that all men and women are capable of
conversion and of reversing their evil ways. He offers all the gift
of forgiveness and asks us to offer the same gift to others. Without
forgiveness there is little hope for any of us.
Theres a lot more to discuss and explore about the subject
of evil and violence, nonviolence and forgiveness. May these musings
at least be an occasiona first step perhapsfor you and
me to start reflecting more on these issues.
|