
|
Each issue carries an imprimatur from
the Archdiocese of Cincinnati. Reprinting prohibited
|
|
|
Adam, Eve and
Original Sin
by Michael D. Guinan, O.F.M.
How many children have remarked to their parents: “It isn’t
fair! Adam and Eve ate the apple, and all of us are stuck
paying for it!” Actually it’s more than children who carry
this attitude. Trying to understand the story of Adam and
Eve and Original Sin can be a daunting exercise for anyone. But
should it be? Exactly what is Genesis teaching here? In this Update,
we will first take a look at the Book of Genesis. Then we’ll see
what it teaches about Original Sin.
Seeing the larger story
When we approach the
Adam and Eve story
(found in Genesis,
Chapters 2 and 3),
we usually start on the wrong foot.
We should not look at this just as
the story of Adam and Eve, but see
it as part of a larger section. We
really need to look at the first 11
chapters of Genesis. These 11 chapters
set the whole story of God, Israel
and all that follows in the Bible in a
universal, cosmic setting. What is
described here has implications for
the universe and all people in it.
Here’s a quick look:
After the creation account (Gn
1:1—2:4), we hear the story of Adam
and Eve. It is the first of four basic
stories in Chapters 2—11: first, Adam
and Eve (2:4b—3:24); second, Cain
and Abel (4:1-26); third, Noah and
the Flood (6:1—9:29); and fourth,
the Tower of Babel (11:1-9). If we
look at these closely, we will discover
that each one of them, in fact, has the
same basic story line: human sin is
followed by punishment, but the last
word in each story is one of grace
from God.
SPONSORED LINKS
Human Sin
In each of the stories, the trouble
begins with human sin. Adam and
Eve eat of the fruit of the forbidden
tree (2:16-17; 3:1-7). (What kind
of fruit is not mentioned and it is
immaterial. The idea that it was an
apple seems to come from a Latin
pun: the same word, malum, means
both “evil” and “apple.”)
The man and the woman together
violate God’s command. Cain assumes
to himself power over life and kills
his brother, Abel (4:8). The generation
of the flood fills the earth with
wickedness and lawlessness (the
Hebrew term used here covers all
kinds of social injustices) (6:5,11).
Finally, the people of Shinar (in
Babylonia) want to ignore God and
make for themselves a great city, a
great tower and a great name (11:4).
The sin in each of these stories is
one and the same, and it is named in
the first story. The snake spells this
out clearly for Adam and Eve, “You
will become like gods!” (3:5). We, as
human beings, as creatures of God,
overstep the limits of creaturehood
and prefer to play God instead. We
reject being an image of God (1:26-
28). We want to be Number One.
And what happens when we do this?
Punishment follows
In each story, the human attempt to
play God is followed by a punishment.
For Adam and Eve, it is basically death
(2:17; 3:19). Cain is made to wander
alone over the earth (4:12). The flood
comes and destroys the sinful generation
and with them all other living
things (7:6—8:14) with the exception
of Noah and company. At the tower of
Babel, the people are scattered, and
their languages are confused (11:7-9).
If the sin in the stories is one and
the same, the punishments also are
really one and the same. It too is
named in the first story: “the moment
you eat…you shall die” (2:17). The punishment is death, but here we
have a problem. For us, death usually
refers to the moment of our last
breath on earth. The Bible takes a
broader view: Death is the breaking
and collapse of all of our relationships
on all their levels. Death is not just a
moment at the end, but a whole realm
of brokenness that affects our lives
on many levels.
This realization can help us deal
with a difficulty in the Adam and
Eve story. They are told that at the
very moment they eat of the tree,
they will die (2:17). They eat, but go on living, Adam for 930 years
(5:5)! What is happening here? The
fact is that the very moment they ate,
they did die. The process began.
They realized their nakedness and
were ashamed (3:7); they hid from
God (3:8); they argued and blamed
each other (3:9-13). The harmonious
relationship between the man and
the woman was broken; it would
end in subjection of Eve to her
husband (3:16). This subjection does
not represent God’s purpose, but is
the effect of sin. To seek to perpetuate
such subjection in the name of the
Bible is surely a travesty.
Further, the relationship to
animals, represented by the snake, is cursed (3:14), as is the relationship
to the earth itself, which now gives
life (crops) only with difficulty
(3:17). With sin, all our other
relationships—those to God, to
ourselves, to other people, to the
natural world—break down. Curse
is the power of death; blessing is
the power of life.
In the other stories, death is
manifested in diverse ways. The first
death recorded in the Bible, that of
Abel, is not a “natural” death at the
end of a full life but rather a sinful
one, a murder. Since Cain cannot live in peace with his brother, he
must wander alone, separated, out of
community (4:12). Human injustice
(6:11) in the days preceding the
flood breaks down the social order.
The cosmic order likewise collapses
and returns, as it were, to chaos.
With profound insight, the tower
of Babel story recognizes that the
scattering of people and their inability
to communicate with each other is
likewise a manifestation of brokenness,
of death.
One further dimension of this
punishment of death needs to be
noted. Even though God is depicted
as intervening like a judge and
speaking a sentence, the punishment is not arbitrary and imposed from
the outside. The punishment flows
from and expresses the inner nature
of the sin. We humans are created
from the life-giving word of God
and breathe with the breath of
God (2:7). To reject God is to turn
our back on the source of our life;
it is to reach out and turn off our
air supply.
What is the cutting off of life
but death? Since we have broken our
relationship with God, the source of
our life, all our other relationships
begin to come apart too. Death is not an arbitrary punishment for sin; it
is an expression, in a certain sense
a “sacrament” (an exterior sign of
an inner spiritual reality) of what sin
really and truly is. Our rejection of
life is at the same time both suicide
and homicide! Our last breath is
simply the last step.
Signs of grace
God creates a harmonious universe
and fills it with life. By rejecting
our imagehood, we bring death and
brokenness. Who will have the last
word? Each of the stories leaves us
in no doubt: God’s will for life and
blessing prevail.
Immediately after the sentence
of death, Eve is named the “mother
of all the living” (3:20) and God
makes garments to cover their shame
(3:21). Cain fears that he will be
killed, so God puts a mark on him
(a tribal tattoo?) as a sign of care and
protection (4:15). Noah, a righteous
man, his family and some animals
survive the flood and are the source of
new life on the earth—God promises
not to destroy the earth again (8:21-22).
The tower of Babel episode is followed
by the call of Abraham, which marks
a further step in God’s new beginning.
God still wills life and blessing for
all creation. “In you [Abraham],
all nations of the earth will be
blessed” (12:3).
What’s Original Sin about?
How does all this relate to
Original Sin? Right at the
beginning we need to ask a
basic question: What do
you mean by Original Sin? The term
“Original Sin” (peccatum originale)
was coined by St. Augustine (353-430),
and his framing of the question has
tended to dominate in Western Latin
Christianity. He distinguished two
aspects of Original Sin, the “originating”
Original Sin (peccatum originale
originans) and the “originated”
Original Sin (peccatum originale
originatum).
The latter (originated) refers to
the concrete human condition which
is present at the birth of each one of
us. We are all born into a world which
in fact is already broken; it is present
at our birth, and we enter into it. It
is about our existence right here and
now. This is a present, existential
understanding.
The former (originating) refers
to the concrete sin of historical first
parents, Adam and Eve. Way back
at the beginning, these first parents
sinned and set the whole thing in motion. Their guilt is passed on
down to all future generations. This
is a past, historical understanding.
But is this what Genesis is really
teaching?
The Catechism of the Catholic
Church explains: “In order to discover
the sacred authors’ intention, the
reader must take into account the
conditions of their time and culture,
the literary genres in use at that time,
and the modes of feeling, speaking
and narrating then current” (#110).
Applying this principle, Scripture
scholars today are taking a new look
at this story. We realize more clearly
now that the story of Adam and Eve
is rather something like a parable.
The truth is in the message of sinfulness
rather than in factual history.
The overall narrative of Genesis
2—11 reflects a “creation-flood story”
that was well known in the ancient
Near East; several examples have
come down to us from Mesopotamia.
The biblical authors used this familiar
(to them) story to teach their own
distinctive view of God, the world
and human beings. In other words,
to read the story of Adam and Eve as
a historical account is to misinterpret
the text. Like a parable, it teaches a
profound truth.
Does this lessen the importance
of the story? Quite the contrary! It
does indeed speak about the origin
of sin. At the origin of our broken,
“death-filled” existence lies the human
attempt to play God. We violate the
limits of creaturehood, and consequences
follow.
In fact, not only is the Adam-Eve
story about Original Sin; so are all
the stories of Genesis 2—11. Each in
its own way deals with an aspect of
the sinful condition present at our
origins. Recent theological studies of
Original Sin, following more closely
the teachings of Genesis, tend to view
it in precisely these terms. It is about the concrete
situation of human life and society
rather than about some kind of taint
or blot passed on biologically throughout
human history. The focus is on
the “originated” Original Sin.
Was there then an historical Adam
and Eve? Cain and Abel? Noah and
the flood generation? Builders of the
tower of Babel? Not in a literal sense.
These are stories composed with figurative
language; they do not give us that
kind of historical information.
But we can ask our question
differently: Are there an Adam and
Eve? Cain and Abel? Noah and the
flood generation? Builders of the
Tower of Babel? Here the answer is
a definite Yes.
If you ask, Where, then, are
Adam and Eve?, the answer is: We
find them when we look in the mirror.
We are Adam, and we are Eve; we
are Cain and Abel; we are the flood
generation who spread injustice over
the earth; we ignore God and build
towers to make great names for
ourselves. The man and woman of
Genesis 2—3, as well as the other
characters of the primal stories, are
intended to represent an Everyman
and Everywoman. They are paradigms,
figurative equivalents, of human
conduct in the face of temptation,
not lessons in biology or history.
The Bible is teaching religion, not
science or literalistic history!
Primal stories such as these
deal with basic structures of human
existence in the world and before
God. They are not windows down
the tunnel of history; they are mirrors
reflecting our own faces. When we
violate our creaturehood, when we
reject being image of God and try
to play God, now, as then, we bring
“death” (in the rich biblical sense)
and brokenness into the world.
Original Sin should be one of the
easiest things to understand and
appreciate. Look at the daily news!
Its effects are all around us. We live
in it up to our ears!
Genesis teaches the truth. These
stories are ultimately about us and the
damage we do to ourselves, to others,
and to God’s good creation when we
forget who we truly are and turn our
backs on God, in whose image we
have been created. Whenever we play
God, the consequences are destructive.
Since this is the case, then, God help
us! And that, of course, is the rest of
the story.
Michael D. Guinan, a Franciscan priest, is a
professor of Old Testament, Semitic languages
and biblical spirituality at the Franciscan
School of Theology in Berkeley, California.
Next: Solidarity (by Marie J. Giblin)
|