Two films featuring two of
America’s best male lead actors
(Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino and Will Smith in Seven Pounds) are
well-made and engrossing stories.
(Spoiler alert: Reading these reviews will necessarily
reveal the plots.) Both films deal
with men who choose to die for others.
While Gran Torino has an urban-cowboy
feel to it, Seven Pounds engages
our deepest sympathy for a man
who believes that, by literally giving
his heart to another, he will
redeem himself. Both films are
morally problematic, one clearly
so while the other is ambiguous.
SPONSORED LINKS
GRAN TORINO
GRAN TORINO (L, R): Walt Kowalski
(Clint Eastwood) is an aging,
grumpy, racist Korean War vet
who lives in a changing neighborhood
where Hmong families
from Vietnam and Laos are moving.
When Thao Lor (Bee Vang) is
forced by Asian gang members to
steal Walt’s treasured 1972 Gran
Torino, Walt responds uncharacteristically
by taking the boy
under his wing.
When the gang lashes out at the Lor
family, Walt runs them off with his
shotgun. Thao’s sister, Sue (Ahney Her),
invites Walt, a widower, to dinner as a
way to thank him, and Walt realizes
that some of the relatives are as wary of
him as he is of them.
Father Janovich (Christopher Carley)
pesters Walt to go to Confession. And
Walt’s son and daughter-in-law (Brian
Haley and Geraldine Hughes) want him
to move into a retirement home so
they can get his property.
When Thao and Sue are attacked by
the gang, Walt makes an irrevocable
decision so the young people may live
in peace. Problem language and violence.
SEVEN POUNDS (L, PG-13): Ben Thomas
(Will Smith) is an IRS agent who seeks
out seven people he deems worthy to
receive gifts that will change their lives.
He meets and falls in love with Emily
(Rosario Dawson), who needs a new
heart.
A flashback reveals that Ben is giving
away parts of himself (his house and his
bodily organs) as a way to redeem himself
for a fatal accident he caused. Suicide,
problem sex and language.
In Gran Torino, Eastwood’s character
evokes the Western hero who saves
the townspeople. There is a mythic
quality to Walt Kowalski, and we can
almost overlook any moral dilemma
at his deliberate choice to incite the
gang to kill him. But was it right for
him to take matters into his own hands,
avoiding both God’s law and civil law?
The filmmakers of Seven Pounds play
on our sympathy for Ben’s guilt. When
he commits suicide so his heart can be
donated to Emily, we may at first think
this is a heroic act.
But throughout the film, Ben
Thomas plays God: He interferes in
people’s lives with good intentions and
changes them without regard for the
consequences. Although we love his
character, his decisions come from such
a lack of faith that it is heartbreaking
because it is so wrong.
We Christians live the ultimate
paradox: We choose life so that
we, and others, may die in God’s
good time. While it is heroic to
give—to sacrifice—one’s life for
another, this does not include suicide.
Neither of these films reflect
Catholic Christian teaching about
authentic charity or life.
As we long to hear Walt snarl in
grand Clint Eastwood tradition,
“Go ahead, make my day,” and
yearn for a way for Ben and Emily
to be together, our enjoyment is
tinged with disappointment for
these heroes.
Just as a person would throw himself
in front of a train to save someone,
Walt drew enemy fire in a lawless urban
war to save his friends. At best, the
ending of Gran Torino is morally
ambiguous. Ben Thomas is a good man
whose choices are more unsettling
because they are so misguided and
wrong, born from his despair.
Gran Torino and Seven Pounds deserve
to be explored because they can generate
reflection and conversation about
what really matters about life and
death. But they are far more than “just
entertainment.”
CHE: Parts I & II (not yet rated, R): Ernesto
“Che” Guevara (1928–1967) was a medical
doctor, husband, father, Marxist
revolutionary and intrepid diarist. His
Notas de viaje became the 2004 film
The Motorcycle Diaries.
Now, Academy Award-winning director
Steven Soderbergh (Traffic) has released a five-hour film (divided into
two parts) based on Che’s journals. Part
I is based on Che’s Reminiscences of the
Cuban Revolutionary War and Part II is
based on The Bolivian Diary of Ernesto
Che Guevara.
This film makes this still-controversial
icon of the Cuban revolution seem
sympathetic, rather than romantic.
Soderbergh and screenwriter Peter
Buchman (Jurassic Park III) use the
words of Che (Benecio Del Toro, 21
Grams) to present Che’s political ideology
for changing the world through
violence. But there is nothing romantic
about hiding out in the jungles of
Cuba and the brush forests of Bolivia.
Del Toro is striking as Che, whose
strong face is hidden by so much hair
we seldom see his face to get a sense of
what he is feeling. To be part of the
struggle, he often told his soldiers, “You
have to believe you are already dead.”
In The Motorcycle Diaries, Che undergoes
a social and political awakening to
the oppression of the poor in Latin
America. But in Part I of Che, the storytelling
is sparse, as if written on the
run. Che mobilizes and trains soldiers
opposing the U.S.-backed Batista government
in Cuba and supports Castro
without question.
Che is kind to people, often tending
to them as a doctor. But he is ruthless
to traitors or those who pillage and
oppress peasants in the name of the
revolution. His visit to the United
Nations in 1964 is fascinating. The documentary
style of Part I gives it an
ambivalent authenticity.
In Part II, Che arrives in Bolivia in
disguise. His time in the Congo and
the years he spent as a member of
Castro’s government are given short
shrift. The peasants, though victims of
government oppression, don’t want to
risk what little they have, and some
resent that foreigners have come to
their country. The Bolivian government
suspects Che is behind the skirmishes
and asks the U.S. government
for help.
Che was killed by a firing squad. The
film makes it clear that his reading of
Marx convinced him that violence was
the only way to fight oppression. Che
received moral and financial support
from European philosophers such as
Sarte and Bertrand Russell.
Che is a difficult film to review
because there isn’t much to tell: One
day follows another; we can’t keep track
of the people who come and go. Part I
was interesting, but I wanted to know
more. Part II was tedious.
When I left the theater after Part II,
I asked a young woman what she
thought of the film. She replied that it
was like a documentary. I disagreed,
because there was not enough information
about the man or his soul to be a
true documentary. The woman responded,
“That’s what books are for.”
Touché.
Students of history may appreciate
what has to be Soderbergh’s commentary
on U.S. government and military
involvement in other countries as told
through Che. Though Che believed
completely in violence, the film’s foundational
subtext is that the use of violence
to fight the violence of oppression
is not the answer. But what is? Problem
violence and language.
THE NO. 1 LADIES’ DETECTIVE
AGENCY (HBO, debuts March
29): Grammy Award-winning
singer Jill Scott plays Precious Ramotswe
in the late Anthony Minghella’s (The
English Patient) final directorial project.
Based on the beloved novels of
Alexander McCall Smith, the two-hour
pilot debuted on BBC in 2008. The
series was filmed in Botswana.
Mma Ramotswe is a “woman of traditional
build” who wants “to do good
with the time God has given her.” Thus,
she opens Botswana’s first ladies’ detective
agency, assisted by her quirky secretary,
Mma Makutsi (Anika Noni Rose,
Dreamgirls). Lucian Msamati plays
J.L.B. Matekoni, Mma Ramotswe’s love
interest.
The premiere is faithful to the spirit
and story line of Smith’s novels. It’s
enjoyable, gentle and good-hearted,
with strong performances—a film that
lets you savor life and art.
|