|
The Resurrection: How We Know It's True
by William H. Shannon
The Resurrection did not mean that Jesus' mortal
life had been prolonged. His life after Resurrection was totally
different from the life he had lived for more than three decades
among his family, friends and followers. That is the intriguing
puzzle that the Resurrection stories make evident to us. Clearly,
after the Resurrection, he was the same Jesus they had known and
followed: They recognized his voice, they touched him, they shared
meals with him. The Gospels very definitely emphasize the physical
character of his appearances.
Yet, equally, the Gospels make clear that there
was something bewilderingly different about the risen Jesus. He
was no longer subject to the limitations that mortality places upon
us (and indeed placed on him, too, before his Resurrection). Once
risen, he could be present to his friends, without their recognizing
him. He could enter rooms where the doors were shut. He could appear
suddenly and just as suddenly disappear, as he did with the two
disciples with whom he broke bread at Emmaus.
In reflecting on the various appearances of Jesus,
it is worth our while to ask the question: To whom did the risen
Jesus appear? Or to put the question another way: To whom might
we expect him to appear?
Certainly he had a wonderful opportunity to dispel
all doubts about the truth of his Resurrection. Thus, he could have
appeared in Pilate's palace, perhaps when Pilate and his wife were
having breakfast. Or Jesus might have suddenly turned up at a meeting
of the Sanhedrin and forced them by the pure evidence of his presence
to accept the fact that a man whom they knew for certain had died
was now, inexplicably but beyond any shadow of a doubt, alive. Another
possibility would have been even more dramatic: He could have had
his followers organize a procession, like they had done on Palm
Sunday. He could have ridden into Jerusalem, mounted this time not
on a lowly donkey, but on a great horse...Yes, these are the kinds
of appearances that would have silenced all doubt.
Writers of textbooks defending the faith would
have been spared a great deal of unnecessary labor if Jesus had
only done things in such reasonable and sensible ways. It would
have made getting people to accept Jesus and his message a breeze,
a pushover. Nonbelievers would be overwhelmed by the evidence. They
would be compelled to become believers or be charged with the rankest
insincerity.
Yet these are precisely the kinds of things that
Jesus did not do. He appeared to no one except those who were disposed
to believe. He appeared only to his chosen disciples. The disciples
may have lost hope in Jesus after he died, but they never lost their
love for him and their faith in him. And it was this love and faith
that gave them the discerning eye that enabled them to recognize
him, when others could not. Seeing the risen Jesus was not an experience
of empirical data; it was an experience of faith.
From the Catholic Update article,
"The Resurrection: How We Know
It's True"
|